Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Why does Ni suppress superconductivity in La₁.₈₅Sr₀.₁₅Cu1-yNiyO₄?

  • Daniel Haskel
  • , Edward A. Stern
  • , Victor Z. Polinger
  • , Fatih Dogan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

<p> The role played by Ni impurities in destroying the superconducting state of La <sub> 2-x </sub> Sr <sub> x </sub> CuO <sub> 4 </sub> is still unclear. This is partly due to the lack of clear experimental evidence on the effect of Ni substitution upon the atomic and electronic structure of this cuprate. To provide this information, we performed Ni K-edge polarized XAFS measurements on oriented powder. A special magnetic alignment geometry allowed us to measure pure &ccirc; and &acirc;b-polarized XAFS in identical experimental conditions. We found that the NiO <sub> 6 </sub> octahedra are contracted along the &ccirc;-axis by 0.16(&Aring;) relative to the CuO <sub> 6 </sub> octahedra in La <sub> 1.85 </sub> Sr <sub> 0.15 </sub> CuO <sub> 4 </sub> , dragging La atoms and causing the observed macroscopic &ccirc;-axis contraction. This contraction reflects the non-Jahn-Teller 3d <sub> 8 </sub> state of Ni in this compound (similar to that in La <sub> 2 </sub> NiO <sub> 4 </sub> ) and indicates that Ni does not "trap" hole carriers but rather, probably, "repels" them. We suggest that this repulsion is the mechanism behind T <sub> c </sub> suppression.</p>
Original languageAmerican English
JournalJournal of Synchrotron Radiation
Volume6
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 1999

Keywords

  • Jahn-Teller
  • Nickel doping
  • Superconductivity

Disciplines

  • Materials Science and Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why does Ni suppress superconductivity in La₁.₈₅Sr₀.₁₅Cu1-yNiyO₄?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this