Abstract
It is well known that a properly placed conductive gasket can complete an enclosure to yield good shielding. But often there are reasons, e.g. control of mechanical dimensions that this cannot be achieved. For these cases, one may want to avoid using a gasket that requires contacts. This paper will analyze alternatives to continuously contacting gaskets such as overlap structures, overlapping structures with different lossy and non-lossy materials, and overlaps with grounding points. It will compare structures by sufficient shielding for a typical class B product, high frequency (1-3 GHz) and low frequency (below 1 GHz) performance.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 205-209 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (2002, Minneapolis, MN) |
| Volume | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 1 2002 |
| Externally published | Yes |
| Event | 2002 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility - Minneapolis, MN, United States Duration: Aug 19 2002 → Aug 23 2002 |
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Condensed Matter Physics
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Keywords
- 1 to 3 GHz
- Class B Product
- Conductive Gasket Alternative
- Continuously Contacting Gaskets
- Earthing
- Electromagnetic Compatibility
- Electromagnetic Shielding
- Enclosure Shielding
- Gaskets
- Grounding Points
- Lossy Materials
- Mechanical Dimensions
- Nonlossy Materials
- Overlap
- Overlap Structures
- Packaging
- Shielding Effectiveness
- Shielding Performance
Disciplines
- Electrical and Computer Engineering
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Alternatives to Gaskets in Shielding an Enclosure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS